You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Answering the myth: use of emergency services on Friday the 13th
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Emergency Medicine, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.06.008 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruce M. Lo, Catherine M. Visintainer, Heidi A. Best, Hind A. Beydoun |
| Abstract |
The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk of Friday the 13th on hospital admission rates and emergency department (ED) visits. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Thailand | 23 | 16% |
| United States | 16 | 11% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 117 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 20 | 14% |
| Scientists | 5 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 85% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 50% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 12% |
| Professor | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 50% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 15% |
| Psychology | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 172. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#238,802
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Emergency Medicine
#48
of 6,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#775
of 134,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Emergency Medicine
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,648 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.