↓ Skip to main content

Koenkai (Candidates Support Organization) and Politics in Japan

Overview of attention for article published in The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association, January 1994
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#47 of 226)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Koenkai (Candidates Support Organization) and Politics in Japan
Published in
The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association, January 1994
DOI 10.7218/nenpouseijigaku1953.45.0_211
Authors

I. Kabashima, M. Yamada

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2020.
All research outputs
#7,690,781
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association
#47
of 226 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,933
of 71,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annuals of Japanese Political Science Association
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 226 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them