↓ Skip to main content

Choosing low-cost institutions in global governance

Overview of attention for article published in International Theory: A Journal of International Politics, Law and Philosophy, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#19 of 273)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Choosing low-cost institutions in global governance
Published in
International Theory: A Journal of International Politics, Law and Philosophy, June 2020
DOI 10.1017/s1752971920000202
Authors

Kenneth W. Abbott, Benjamin Faude

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 4 8%
Lecturer 3 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 18 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 31 58%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Unknown 18 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,122,640
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from International Theory: A Journal of International Politics, Law and Philosophy
#19
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,526
of 433,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Theory: A Journal of International Politics, Law and Philosophy
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.