↓ Skip to main content

The Built Environment and Child Health: An Overview of Current Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Current Environmental Health Reports, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
The Built Environment and Child Health: An Overview of Current Evidence
Published in
Current Environmental Health Reports, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40572-016-0094-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mireia Gascon, Martine Vrijheid, Mark J. Nieuwenhuijsen

Abstract

Urbanization and the shaping of the built environment have provided a number of socioeconomic benefits, but they have also brought unwanted side effects on health. We aimed to review the current epidemiological evidence of the associations between the built environment, closely related exposures, and child health. We focused on growth and obesity, neuropsychological development, and respiratory and immune health. We used existing review articles and supplemented these with relevant work published and not included in existing reviews. The present review shows that there is good evidence for an association between air pollution and fetal growth restriction and respiratory health, whereas for other exposure and outcome combinations, further evidence is needed. Future studies should make efforts to integrate the different built environment features and to include the evaluation of environments other than home, as well as accessibility, qualitative and perception assessment of the built environment, and, if possible, with improved and standardized tools to facilitate comparability between studies. Efforts are also needed to conduct longitudinal and intervention studies and to understand potential mechanisms behind the associations observed. Finally, studies in low- and middle-income countries are needed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Unknown 185 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 16%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 11 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 24 13%
Unknown 53 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 11%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Environmental Science 13 7%
Design 9 5%
Other 41 22%
Unknown 70 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2017.
All research outputs
#12,898,218
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Current Environmental Health Reports
#210
of 324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,065
of 335,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Environmental Health Reports
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.