| Title |
Recommendations for head and neck surgical oncology practice in a setting of acute severe resource constraint during the COVID-19 pandemic: an international consensus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Lancet Oncology, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30334-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hisham Mehanna, John C Hardman, Jared A Shenson, Ahmad K Abou-Foul, Michael C Topf, Mohammad AlFalasi, Jason Y K Chan, Pankaj Chaturvedi, Velda Ling Yu Chow, Andreas Dietz, Johannes J Fagan, Christian Godballe, Wojciech Golusiński, Akihiro Homma, Sefik Hosal, N Gopalakrishna Iyer, Cyrus Kerawala, Yoon Woo Koh, Anna Konney, Luiz P Kowalski, Dennis Kraus, Moni A Kuriakose, Efthymios Kyrodimos, Stephen Y Lai, C Rene Leemans, Paul Lennon, Lisa Licitra, Pei-Jen Lou, Bernard Lyons, Haitham Mirghani, Anthonny C Nichols, Vinidh Paleri, Benedict J Panizza, Pablo Parente Arias, Mihir R Patel, Cesare Piazza, Danny Rischin, Alvaro Sanabria, Robert P Takes, David J Thomson, Ravindra Uppaluri, Yu Wang, Sue S Yom, Yi-Ming Zhu, Sandro V Porceddu, John R de Almeida, Chrisian Simon, F Christopher Holsinger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 76 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 15 | 20% |
| Australia | 7 | 9% |
| United States | 7 | 9% |
| Spain | 6 | 8% |
| Colombia | 4 | 5% |
| South Africa | 3 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 28% |
| Scientists | 10 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 243 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 57 | 23% |
| Unknown | 86 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 12% |
| Unknown | 97 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#825,167
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Oncology
#1,030
of 6,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,966
of 434,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Oncology
#32
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.