| Title |
The impact of COVID-19 and strategies for mitigation and suppression in low- and middle-income countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.abc0035 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Patrick G T Walker, Charles Whittaker, Oliver J Watson, Marc Baguelin, Peter Winskill, Arran Hamlet, Bimandra A Djafaara, Zulma Cucunubá, Daniela Olivera Mesa, Will Green, Hayley Thompson, Shevanthi Nayagam, Kylie E C Ainslie, Sangeeta Bhatia, Samir Bhatt, Adhiratha Boonyasiri, Olivia Boyd, Nicholas F Brazeau, Lorenzo Cattarino, Gina Cuomo-Dannenburg, Amy Dighe, Christl A Donnelly, Ilaria Dorigatti, Sabine L van Elsland, Rich FitzJohn, Han Fu, Katy A M Gaythorpe, Lily Geidelberg, Nicholas Grassly, David Haw, Sarah Hayes, Wes Hinsley, Natsuko Imai, David Jorgensen, Edward Knock, Daniel Laydon, Swapnil Mishra, Gemma Nedjati-Gilani, Lucy C Okell, H Juliette Unwin, Robert Verity, Michaela Vollmer, Caroline E Walters, Haowei Wang, Yuanrong Wang, Xiaoyue Xi, David G Lalloo, Neil M Ferguson, Azra C Ghani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,991 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 486 | 24% |
| United States | 118 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 93 | 5% |
| Colombia | 68 | 3% |
| Brazil | 24 | 1% |
| India | 19 | <1% |
| South Africa | 15 | <1% |
| Chile | 15 | <1% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 14 | <1% |
| Other | 177 | 9% |
| Unknown | 962 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1748 | 88% |
| Scientists | 155 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 63 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 24 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,001 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1001 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 114 | 11% |
| Researcher | 112 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 91 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 56 | 6% |
| Other | 186 | 19% |
| Unknown | 353 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 148 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 65 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 59 | 6% |
| Engineering | 41 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 4% |
| Other | 256 | 26% |
| Unknown | 395 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1103. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#13,900
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from Science
#703
of 83,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#712
of 434,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#41
of 975 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 975 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.