↓ Skip to main content

Ambient air pollution and lung disease in China: health effects, study design approaches and future research

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers of Medicine, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 349)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Ambient air pollution and lung disease in China: health effects, study design approaches and future research
Published in
Frontiers of Medicine, June 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11684-015-0397-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey H. Mandel, Christine Wendt, Charles Lo, Guangbiao Zhou, Marshall Hertz, Gurumurthy Ramachandran

Abstract

Ambient air pollution in China has worsened following dramatic increases in industrialization, automobile use and energy consumption. Particularly bothersome is the increase in the PM2.5 fraction of pollutants. This fraction has been associated with increasing rates of cardio-respiratory disease in China and elsewhere. Ambient pollutant levels have been described in many of China's cities and are comparable to previous levels in southern California. Lung cancer mortality in China has increased since the 1970s and has been higher in men and in urban areas, the exact explanation for which has not been determined. The estimation of individual risk for Chinese citizens living in areas of air pollution will require further research. Occupational cohort and case-control designs each have unique attributes that could make them helpful to use in this setting. Other important future research considerations include detailed exposure assessment and the possible use of biomarkers as a means to better understand and manage the threat posed by air pollution in China.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 14 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 8 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 13 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,220,481
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers of Medicine
#28
of 349 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,632
of 264,471 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers of Medicine
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 349 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,471 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them