| Title |
Dinocyst microlaminations and freshwater "red tides" recorded in Lake Xiaolongwan, northeastern China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Paleolimnology, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10933-007-9106-1 |
| Authors |
Guoqiang Chu, Qing Sun, Patrick Rioual, Andrés Boltovskoy, Qiang Liu, Peiqi Sun, Jintai Han, Jiaqi Liu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 3% |
| Latvia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 36% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 11 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2016.
All research outputs
#7,483,725
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Paleolimnology
#123
of 401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,324
of 72,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Paleolimnology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them