↓ Skip to main content

Antimicrobial susceptibility and synergy studies of cystic fibrosis sputum by direct sputum sensitivity testing

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antimicrobial susceptibility and synergy studies of cystic fibrosis sputum by direct sputum sensitivity testing
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10096-012-1687-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

D. J. Serisier, A. Tuck, D. Matley, M. P. Carroll, G. Jones

Abstract

Standard disc diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing (C+S) on individual Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonial morphotypes cultured from cystic fibrosis (CF) sputum has questionable clinical relevance. Direct sputum sensitivity testing (DSST) is a whole-sputum susceptibility test that removes bias associated with selecting individual colonial morphotypes. We sought to determine whether, in principle, the results from DSST support the possibility of improved clinical relevance compared with C+S. Individual (DSSTi) and combination (DSST) susceptibility to gentamicin, tobramycin, ceftazidime and meropenem were determined on 130 sputum samples referred from CF subjects with antibiotic-resistant chronic Gram-negative endobronchial infection. DSSTi and concurrent C+S were compared for categorical susceptibility, synergistic combinations were evaluated and the combination DSST efficacy index (DEI) calculated. Meropenem and tobramycin were the most active individual antibiotics by DSSTi on 89 P. aeruginosa-predominant samples, with 62 % of samples sensitive to each. C+S and DSSTi showed poor agreement (κ ranging from 0.02 to 0.6), discordance ranging from 20 % (meropenem) to 49 % (tobramycin), with DSSTi demonstrating both increased susceptibility and increased resistance. The combination that most frequently had the highest DEI was tobramycin + meropenem, occurring in 76 % of samples. DSSTi appears to be reproducible, yields different antimicrobial susceptibility results from C+S without simply identifying the most resistant isolates and DSST identifies the most effective in vitro antibiotic combinations, providing preliminary proof of concept of the potentially improved clinical relevance of whole-sputum testing. Future studies will determine whether these potential theoretical advantages translate into clinical benefits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Master 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Other 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 7 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 34%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 7 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2012.
All research outputs
#20,161,674
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#2,404
of 2,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,916
of 164,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
#26
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.