| Title |
Maternal transmission of SARS‐COV‐2 to the neonate, and possible routes for such transmission: a systematic review and critical analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1471-0528.16362 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kate F Walker, Keelin O’Donoghue, Nicky Grace, Jon Dorling, Jeannette L Comeau, Wentao Li, Jim G Thornton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 336 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 91 | 27% |
| United States | 25 | 7% |
| Ireland | 24 | 7% |
| Australia | 15 | 4% |
| Spain | 8 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 27 | 8% |
| Unknown | 135 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 207 | 62% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 65 | 19% |
| Scientists | 57 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 530 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 530 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 68 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 10% |
| Researcher | 47 | 9% |
| Other | 34 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 5% |
| Other | 104 | 20% |
| Unknown | 196 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 152 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 78 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 49 | 9% |
| Unknown | 218 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 487. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2022.
All research outputs
#55,057
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#8
of 6,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,073
of 430,248 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#1
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,248 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.