↓ Skip to main content

Preliminary Efficacy of Family Implemented TEACCH for Toddlers: Effects on Parents and Their Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
8 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
246 Mendeley
Title
Preliminary Efficacy of Family Implemented TEACCH for Toddlers: Effects on Parents and Their Toddlers with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10803-016-2812-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lauren Turner-Brown, Kara Hume, Brian A. Boyd, Kirsten Kainz

Abstract

This study examined the effects of an intervention to support parents and promote skill development in newly diagnosed toddlers with ASD. Participants included 50 children with ASD under 3 and their parents who were randomly assigned to participate in a 6-month intervention, Family Implemented TEACCH for Toddlers (FITT) or 6 months of community services as usual. FITT included 90-min in-home sessions (n = 20) and parent group sessions (n = 4). Results revealed significant treatment effects on parent stress and well-being, with families in the FITT group showing decreased stress and improved well-being over time. While no treatment effects were found for global child measures, there were significant treatment effects on social communication skills.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 246 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 245 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 14%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Student > Master 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 85 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 28%
Social Sciences 24 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 7%
Neuroscience 3 1%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 94 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2021.
All research outputs
#3,438,453
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,447
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,272
of 353,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#13
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,757 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.