You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
医薬品の第三者への転売・譲渡の違法性に関する消費者の意識調査
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.11256/jjdi.22.30 |
| Authors |
大谷 壽一, 藤井 萌未, 今岡 鮎子, 望月 眞弓, 山浦 克典, 秋好 健志 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#14,354,868
of 25,497,142 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
#35
of 121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,283
of 410,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Drug Informatics
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,497,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.