↓ Skip to main content

Modelling epidemics: Technical and critical issues in the context of COVID-19

Overview of attention for article published in Dialogues in Human Geography, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Modelling epidemics: Technical and critical issues in the context of COVID-19
Published in
Dialogues in Human Geography, June 2020
DOI 10.1177/2043820620934328
Authors

Chris Brunsdon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 6 33%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Social Sciences 4 22%
Philosophy 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 6 33%
Unknown 1 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2020.
All research outputs
#14,954,227
of 23,213,531 outputs
Outputs from Dialogues in Human Geography
#257
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,285
of 398,726 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dialogues in Human Geography
#44
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,213,531 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,726 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.