You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effects of Establishing Intimacy and Consubstantiality on Group Discussions About Climate Change Solutions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science Communication, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1177/1075547020927017 |
| Authors |
Emma Frances Bloomfield, Lyn M. Van Swol, Chen-Ting Chang, Stephanie Willes, Paul Hangsan Ahn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 60% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 20% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,232,111
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Science Communication
#251
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,018
of 433,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science Communication
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.