↓ Skip to main content

Naive Modus Ponens

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Philosophical Logic, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Naive Modus Ponens
Published in
Journal of Philosophical Logic, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10992-012-9239-1
Authors

Elia Zardini

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 9%
Unknown 10 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 6 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2012.
All research outputs
#15,247,248
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#185
of 345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,989
of 164,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Philosophical Logic
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.