↓ Skip to main content

Good attachment in the Asian highlands: questioning notions of “loose women” and “autonomous communities”

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Asian Studies, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Good attachment in the Asian highlands: questioning notions of “loose women” and “autonomous communities”
Published in
Critical Asian Studies, June 2020
DOI 10.1080/14672715.2020.1772092
Authors

Hjorleifur Jonsson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 20%
Social Sciences 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2020.
All research outputs
#18,066,966
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from Critical Asian Studies
#295
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,060
of 398,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Asian Studies
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.