| Title |
The network BiodiversityKnowledge in practice: insights from three trial assessments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1128-4 |
| Authors |
Stefan Schindler, Barbara Livoreil, Isabel Sousa Pinto, Rita M. Araújo, Klaus Peter Zulka, Andrew S. Pullin, Luis Santamaria, Michaela Kropik, Pablo Fernández-Méndez, Thomas Wrbka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 38% |
| Germany | 1 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 88% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 16 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 14 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2016.
All research outputs
#7,310,075
of 25,304,569 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,046
of 2,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,622
of 346,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#30
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,304,569 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,405 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.