You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Rethinking funding priorities in mental health research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Psychiatry, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.179895 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Roberto Lewis-Fernández, Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus, Virginia Trotter Betts, Lisa Greenman, Susan M Essock, Javier I Escobar, Deanna Barch, Michael F Hogan, Patricia A Areán, Benjamin G Druss, Ralph J DiClemente, Thomas H McGlashan, Dilip V Jeste, Enola K Proctor, Pedro Ruiz, A John Rush, Glorisa J Canino, Carl C Bell, Renata Henry, Portia Iversen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 29% |
| United States | 9 | 16% |
| Canada | 3 | 5% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 22% |
| Scientists | 9 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Researcher | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 32% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 22 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#484,921
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychiatry
#247
of 6,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,210
of 449,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychiatry
#174
of 5,295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.