↓ Skip to main content

Community treatment orders and reduced time in hospital: a nationwide study, 2007–2012

Overview of attention for article published in BJPsych Bulletin, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Community treatment orders and reduced time in hospital: a nationwide study, 2007–2012
Published in
BJPsych Bulletin, January 2018
DOI 10.1192/pb.bp.115.051045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Taylor, Melanie Macpherson, Callum Macleod, Donald Lyons

Abstract

Aims and method Community treatment orders (CTOs) were introduced in Scotland in 2005, but are controversial owing to a lack of supportive randomised evidence. The non-randomised studies provide mixed results on their efficacy and utility. We aimed to examine hospital bed day usage across Scotland both before and after CTOs were initiated in a national cohort of patients, spanning 5 years. Results In total, 1558 individuals who were subject to a CTO between 2007 and 2012, of whom 63% were male, were included. After CTO initiation the number of hospital bed days fell, on average, from 66 to 39 per annum per patient. Those with a longer psychiatric history appeared to benefit more from a CTO, in terms of reduced time in hospital. Clinical implications Our data offer cautious support for the use of CTOs in routine practice, in terms of reducing time spent in psychiatric hospital. This finding is balanced by the more rigorous randomised studies which do not find any benefit to CTOs.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 18%
Student > Postgraduate 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Other 2 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 3 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%