| Title |
From Evidence-based Medicine to Marketing-based Medicine: Evidence from Internal Industry Documents
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11673-010-9208-8 |
| Authors |
Glen I. Spielmans, Peter I. Parry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Poland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 11% |
| Scientists | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 161 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 19% |
| Other | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 57 | 31% |
| Unknown | 17 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 46% |
| Psychology | 19 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Philosophy | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 17% |
| Unknown | 21 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2023.
All research outputs
#911,745
of 25,446,666 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#30
of 667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,445
of 172,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,446,666 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them