You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The diffusion of innovative diabetes technologies as a fundamental cause of social inequalities in health. The Nord‐Trøndelag Health Study, Norway
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Sociology of Health & Illness, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1467-9566.13147 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Weiss, Erik R. Sund, Jeremy Freese, Steinar Krokstad |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 56% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,133,353
of 25,386,051 outputs
Outputs from Sociology of Health & Illness
#450
of 2,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,138
of 405,904 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sociology of Health & Illness
#14
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,386,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,904 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.