↓ Skip to main content

Historical Institutionalism Meets Practice Theory: Renewing the Selection Process of the United Nations Secretary-General

Overview of attention for article published in International Organization, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Historical Institutionalism Meets Practice Theory: Renewing the Selection Process of the United Nations Secretary-General
Published in
International Organization, June 2020
DOI 10.1017/s002081832000020x
Authors

Vincent Pouliot

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Unspecified 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 30 57%
Unspecified 6 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,582,783
of 25,460,914 outputs
Outputs from International Organization
#257
of 982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,428
of 434,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Organization
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.