You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The quiet failures of early neoliberalism: From rational expectations to Keynesianism in reverse
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of International Studies, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0260210520000169 |
| Authors |
Jacqueline Best |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 150 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 11% |
| United States | 16 | 11% |
| Canada | 5 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 4 | 3% |
| Belgium | 4 | 3% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 16 | 11% |
| Unknown | 77 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 111 | 74% |
| Scientists | 34 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 29% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 124. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#343,121
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Review of International Studies
#5
of 953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,030
of 434,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of International Studies
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,975 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.