| Title |
Multifunctional floodplain management and biodiversity effects: a knowledge synthesis for six European countries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-016-1129-3 |
| Authors |
Stefan Schindler, Fionnuala H. O’Neill, Marianna Biró, Christian Damm, Viktor Gasso, Robert Kanka, Theo van der Sluis, Andreas Krug, Sophie G. Lauwaars, Zita Sebesvari, Martin Pusch, Boris Baranovsky, Thomas Ehlert, Bernd Neukirchen, James R. Martin, Katrin Euller, Volker Mauerhofer, Thomas Wrbka |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 33% |
| Italy | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 232 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 19% |
| Researcher | 42 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 14% |
| Unknown | 59 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 57 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 5% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 81 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,873,876
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#595
of 2,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,125
of 356,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#18
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.