↓ Skip to main content

How simple can a model of an empty viral capsid be? Charge distributions in viral capsids

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biological Physics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
How simple can a model of an empty viral capsid be? Charge distributions in viral capsids
Published in
Journal of Biological Physics, September 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10867-012-9278-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anže Lošdorfer Božič, Antonio Šiber, Rudolf Podgornik

Abstract

We investigate and quantify salient features of the charge distributions on viral capsids. Our analysis combines the experimentally determined capsid geometry with simple models for ionization of amino acids, thus yielding a detailed description of spatial distribution for positive and negative charges across the capsid wall. The obtained data is processed in order to extract the mean radii of distributions, surface charge densities, as well as dipole moment densities. The results are evaluated and examined in light of previously proposed models of capsid charge distributions, which are shown to have to some extent limited value when applied to real viruses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 9%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 42 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 26%
Professor 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 14 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 17%
Chemistry 5 11%
Engineering 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 7 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,147,730
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biological Physics
#126
of 297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,145
of 169,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biological Physics
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 297 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,172 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.