↓ Skip to main content

De Novo Variants in CNOT1, a Central Component of the CCR4-NOT Complex Involved in Gene Expression and RNA and Protein Stability, Cause Neurodevelopmental Delay

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Genetics, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
15 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
De Novo Variants in CNOT1, a Central Component of the CCR4-NOT Complex Involved in Gene Expression and RNA and Protein Stability, Cause Neurodevelopmental Delay
Published in
American Journal of Human Genetics, June 2020
DOI 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.05.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisenka E.L.M. Vissers, Sreehari Kalvakuri, Elke de Boer, Sinje Geuer, Machteld Oud, Inge van Outersterp, Michael Kwint, Melde Witmond, Simone Kersten, Daniel L. Polla, Dilys Weijers, Amber Begtrup, Kirsty McWalter, Anna Ruiz, Elisabeth Gabau, Jenny E.V. Morton, Christopher Griffith, Karin Weiss, Candace Gamble, James Bartley, Hilary J. Vernon, Kendra Brunet, Claudia Ruivenkamp, Sarina G. Kant, Paul Kruszka, Austin Larson, Alexandra Afenjar, Thierry Billette de Villemeur, Kimberly Nugent, the DDD Study, F. Lucy Raymond, Hanka Venselaar, Florence Demurger, Claudia Soler-Alfonso, Dong Li, Elizabeth Bhoj, Ian Hayes, Nina Powell Hamilton, Ayesha Ahmad, Rachel Fisher, Myrthe van den Born, Marjolaine Willems, Arthur Sorlin, Julian Delanne, Sebastien Moutton, Philippe Christophe, Frederic Tran Mau-Them, Antonio Vitobello, Himanshu Goel, Lauren Massingham, Chanika Phornphutkul, Jennifer Schwab, Boris Keren, Perrine Charles, Maaike Vreeburg, Lenika De Simone, George Hoganson, Maria Iascone, Donatella Milani, Lucie Evenepoel, Nicole Revencu, D. Isum Ward, Kaitlyn Burns, Ian Krantz, Sarah E. Raible, Jill R. Murrell, Kathleen Wood, Megan T. Cho, Hans van Bokhoven, Maximilian Muenke, Tjitske Kleefstra, Rolf Bodmer, Arjan P.M. de Brouwer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Student > Master 11 15%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 26 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 20%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Psychology 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 30 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 128. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2021.
All research outputs
#332,356
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Genetics
#116
of 6,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,711
of 437,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Genetics
#4
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.