↓ Skip to main content

Development and Validation of the Gene Expression Predictor of High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Molecular SubTYPE (PrOTYPE)

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
30 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and Validation of the Gene Expression Predictor of High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma Molecular SubTYPE (PrOTYPE)
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, October 2020
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-0103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aline Talhouk, Joshy George, Chen Wang, Timothy Budden, Tuan Zea Tan, Derek S. Chiu, Stefan Kommoss, Huei San Leong, Stephanie Chen, Maria P. Intermaggio, Blake Gilks, Tayyebeh M. Nazeran, Mila Volchek, Wafaa Elatre, Rex C. Bentley, Janine Senz, Amy Lum, Veronica Chow, Hanwei Sudderuddin, Robertson Mackenzie, Samuel C.Y. Leong, Geyi Liu, Dustin Johnson, Billy Chen, AOCS Group, Jennifer Alsop, Susana N. Banerjee, Sabine Behrens, Clara Bodelon, Alison H. Brand, Louise Brinton, Michael E. Carney, Yoke-Eng Chiew, Kara L. Cushing-Haugen, Cezary Cybulski, Darren Ennis, Sian Fereday, Renée T. Fortner, Jesús García-Donas, Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj, Rosalind Glasspool, Teodora Goranova, Casey S. Greene, Paul Haluska, Holly R. Harris, Joy Hendley, Brenda Y. Hernandez, Esther Herpel, Mercedes Jimenez-Linan, Chloe Karpinskyj, Scott H. Kaufmann, Gary L. Keeney, Catherine J. Kennedy, Martin Köbel, Jennifer M. Koziak, Melissa C. Larson, Jenny Lester, Liz-Anne Lewsley, Jolanta Lissowska, Jan Lubiński, Hugh Luk, Geoff Macintyre, Sven Mahner, Iain A. McNeish, Janusz Menkiszak, Nikilyn Nevins, Ana Osorio, Oleg Oszurek, José Palacios, Samantha Hinsley, Celeste L. Pearce, Malcolm C. Pike, Anna M. Piskorz, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Valerie Rhenius, Cristina Rodriguez-Antona, Raghwa Sharma, Mark E. Sherman, Dilrini De Silva, Naveena Singh, Peter Sinn, Dennis Slamon, Honglin Song, Helen Steed, Euan A. Stronach, Pamela J. Thompson, Aleksandra Tołoczko, Britton Trabert, Nadia Traficante, Chiu-Chen Tseng, Martin Widschwendter, Lynne R. Wilkens, Stacey J. Winham, Boris Winterhoff, Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel, Javier Benitez, Andrew Berchuck, James D. Brenton, Robert Brown, Jenny Chang-Claude, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Anna deFazio, Peter A. Fasching, María J. García, Simon A. Gayther, Marc T. Goodman, Jacek Gronwald, Michelle J. Henderson, Beth Y. Karlan, Linda E. Kelemen, Usha Menon, Sandra Orsulic, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Nicolas Wentzensen, Anna H. Wu, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Mary Anne Rossing, Gottfried E. Konecny, David G. Huntsman, Ruby Yun-Ju Huang, Ellen L. Goode, Susan J. Ramus, Jennifer A. Doherty, David D. Bowtell, Michael S. Anglesio

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 73 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 3 4%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 29 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 30 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2021.
All research outputs
#655,058
of 25,459,177 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#393
of 13,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,501
of 436,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#19
of 202 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,459,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 202 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.