↓ Skip to main content

Energy recovery from thermal treatment of dewatered sludge in wastewater treatment plants

Overview of attention for article published in Water Science & Technology, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Energy recovery from thermal treatment of dewatered sludge in wastewater treatment plants
Published in
Water Science & Technology, May 2016
DOI 10.2166/wst.2016.251
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qingfeng Yang, Karla Dussan, Rory F. D. Monaghan, Xinmin Zhan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 28%
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 31%
Chemical Engineering 5 14%
Unspecified 4 11%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Energy 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2016.
All research outputs
#15,376,252
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Water Science & Technology
#2,047
of 2,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,506
of 338,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Water Science & Technology
#18
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,968 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.