You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparing reconstructed past variations and future projections of the Baltic Sea ecosystem—first results from multi-model ensemble simulations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Research Letters (ERL), July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034005 |
| Authors |
H E Markus Meier, Helén C Andersson, Berit Arheimer, Thorsten Blenckner, Boris Chubarenko, Chantal Donnelly, Kari Eilola, Bo G Gustafsson, Anders Hansson, Jonathan Havenhand, Anders Höglund, Ivan Kuznetsov, Brian R MacKenzie, Bärbel Müller-Karulis, Thomas Neumann, Susa Niiranen, Joanna Piwowarczyk, Urmas Raudsepp, Marcus Reckermann, Tuija Ruoho-Airola, Oleg P Savchuk, Frederik Schenk, Semjon Schimanke, Germo Väli, Jan-Marcin Weslawski, Eduardo Zorita |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 2 | 1% |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Qatar | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 16% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 41 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 39 | 25% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 23 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,378,079
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#1,669
of 6,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,459
of 180,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Research Letters (ERL)
#10
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 51.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.