↓ Skip to main content

If overuse injury is a ‘training load error’, should undertraining be viewed the same way?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
197 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
303 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
If overuse injury is a ‘training load error’, should undertraining be viewed the same way?
Published in
British Journal of Sports Medicine, June 2016
DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim J Gabbett, Steve Kennelly, Joe Sheehan, Richard Hawkins, Jordan Milsom, Enda King, Rod Whiteley, Jan Ekstrand

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 197 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 303 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Austria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Qatar 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 298 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 64 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 11%
Student > Bachelor 31 10%
Researcher 26 9%
Other 24 8%
Other 63 21%
Unknown 62 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 146 48%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Engineering 4 1%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 75 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 143. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2021.
All research outputs
#287,410
of 25,352,304 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#622
of 6,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,609
of 347,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Sports Medicine
#29
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,352,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,480 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 347,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.