| Title |
Pyrophosphorolysis-Activated Polymerization Detects Circulating Tumor DNA in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-0309 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jordan Madic, Sophie Piperno-Neumann, Vincent Servois, Aurore Rampanou, Maud Milder, Bénédicte Trouiller, David Gentien, Stéphanie Saada, Franck Assayag, Aurélie Thuleau, Fariba Nemati, Didier Decaudin, François-Clément Bidard, Laurence Desjardins, Pascale Mariani, Olivier Lantz, Marc-Henri Stern |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 1 | 17% |
| Mexico | 1 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 29% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 18% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,753,214
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#1,293
of 13,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,133
of 182,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#5
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.