Title |
Campath 1-H treatment in patients with aggressive relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Neurology, February 2008
|
DOI | 10.1007/s00415-008-0696-y |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. L. Hirst, A. Pace, T. P. Pickersgill, R. Jones, B. N. McLean, J. P. Zajicek, N. J. Scolding, N. P. Robertson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Professor | 4 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
Other | 16 | 21% |
Unknown | 16 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 36% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 21 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,291,051
of 22,875,477 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#415
of 4,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,298
of 80,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,875,477 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.