| Title |
Protein misfolding, aggregation, and degradation in disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Biotechnology, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1385/mb:31:2:141 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niels Gregersen, Lars Bolund, Peter Bross |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 51 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 41% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,210
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biotechnology
#140
of 1,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,475
of 151,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biotechnology
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 151,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.