↓ Skip to main content

Local Infiltration Analgesia Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty

Overview of attention for article published in Anesthesia and analgesia, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local Infiltration Analgesia Versus Intrathecal Morphine for Postoperative Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty
Published in
Anesthesia and analgesia, August 2011
DOI 10.1213/ane.0b013e3182288deb
Pubmed ID
Authors

Per Essving, Kjell Axelsson, Elisabeth Åberg, Henrik Spännar, Anil Gupta, Anders Lundin

Abstract

Local infiltration analgesia (LIA)--using a combination of local anesthetics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and epinephrine, injected periarticularly during surgery-has become popular in postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We compared intrathecal morphine with LIA after TKA.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Iceland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 150 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 13%
Other 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Master 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Other 41 26%
Unknown 33 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 13 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,923,515
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Anesthesia and analgesia
#1,539
of 8,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,820
of 131,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Anesthesia and analgesia
#6
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.