| Title |
Emotion processing and social participation following stroke: study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neurology, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2377-12-56 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Clare L Scott, Louise H Phillips, Marie Johnston, Maggie M Whyte, Mary J MacLeod |
| Abstract |
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) defines participation as a person's performance in life situations, including the size of social networks, and satisfaction with social contacts. Stroke survivors are known to experience a reduction in the number of their social networks and contacts, which cannot be explained solely in terms of activity limitations caused by physical impairment. Problems of emotional processing, including impaired mood, emotion regulation and emotion perception, are known to occur following stroke and can detrimentally influence many aspects of social interaction and participation. The aim of this study is to investigate whether emotion processing impairments predict stroke survivors' restricted social participation, independent of problems with activity limitation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Egypt | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 130 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Researcher | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 21 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 25 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 40 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2012.
All research outputs
#13,667,301
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#1,136
of 2,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,322
of 143,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#30
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,415 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.