Title |
Heterogeneous Beliefs and Climate Catastrophes
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental and Resource Economics, June 2016
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10640-016-0036-0 |
Authors |
Tatiana Kiseleva |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 27% |
Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 27% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 14% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 9% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2016.
All research outputs
#5,893,473
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Environmental and Resource Economics
#458
of 988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,839
of 343,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental and Resource Economics
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.