| Title |
A global life cycle assessment for primary zinc production
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11367-016-1131-8 |
| Authors |
Eric Van Genderen, Maggie Wildnauer, Nick Santero, Nadir Sidi |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 144 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 16% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 42 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 28 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 22 | 15% |
| Chemical Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 6 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 12% |
| Unknown | 60 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,284,209
of 24,375,780 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#109
of 1,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,401
of 344,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
#3
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,375,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,005 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,940 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.