↓ Skip to main content

Site-level importance of broadleaf deciduous trees outweighs the legacy of high nitrogen (N) deposition on ecosystem N status of Central Appalachian red spruce forests

Overview of attention for article published in Plant and Soil, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Site-level importance of broadleaf deciduous trees outweighs the legacy of high nitrogen (N) deposition on ecosystem N status of Central Appalachian red spruce forests
Published in
Plant and Soil, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11104-016-2940-z
Authors

Kenneth R. Smith, Justin M. Mathias, Brenden E. McNeil, William T. Peterjohn, Richard B. Thomas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 16%
Professor 3 16%
Other 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 3 16%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 6 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 32%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,218,560
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Plant and Soil
#1,801
of 3,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,756
of 343,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant and Soil
#18
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,220 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.