↓ Skip to main content

Status of Toxic Metals in Biological Samples of Diabetic Mothers and Their Neonates

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Trace Element Research, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Status of Toxic Metals in Biological Samples of Diabetic Mothers and Their Neonates
Published in
Biological Trace Element Research, October 2010
DOI 10.1007/s12011-010-8879-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nida Fatima Kolachi, Tasneem Gul Kazi, Hassan Imran Afridi, Naveed Kazi, Sumaira Khan, Ghulam Abbas Kandhro, Abdul Qadir Shah, Jameel Ahmed Baig, Sham Kumar Wadhwa, Faheem Shah, Mohammad Khan Jamali, Mohammad Balal Arain

Abstract

The mechanism of transport of trace elements from the mother to the newborn is still not well known. The aim of present study was to compare the status of trace toxic elements, arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb) in biological samples (whole blood, urine and scalp hair) of insulin-dependent diabetic mothers (age ranged 30-40) and their newly born infants (n = 76). An age and socioeconomics matched 68 nondiabetic mothers and their infants, residing in the same locality, who were selected as referents. The elemental concentrations in all three biological samples were determined by an electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometer, prior to microwave-assisted acid digestion. The mean values of As, Cd, and Pb in all biological samples of diabetic mothers and their infants were significantly higher as compared to the referent mother-infant pair samples (p < 0.01). The high levels of As, Cd, and Pb in biological samples of diabetic women may play a role in the pathogenesis of diabetes mellitus and impacts on their neonates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 14%
Researcher 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 10 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 26%
Chemistry 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 14%
Environmental Science 2 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2019.
All research outputs
#6,751,316
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Biological Trace Element Research
#407
of 2,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,956
of 99,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Trace Element Research
#6
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,013 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.