You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conservation planners tend to ignore improved accuracy of modelled species distributions to focus on multiple threats and ecological processes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.023 |
| Authors |
Ayesha I.T. Tulloch, Patricia Sutcliffe, Ilona Naujokaitis-Lewis, Reid Tingley, Lluis Brotons, Katia Maria P.M.B. Ferraz, Hugh Possingham, Antoine Guisan, Jonathan R. Rhodes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 6 | 40% |
| Spain | 3 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 53% |
| Scientists | 7 | 47% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 363 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 353 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 85 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 59 | 16% |
| Unknown | 64 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 132 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 107 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 1% |
| Engineering | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 19 | 5% |
| Unknown | 80 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,792,785
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#2,888
of 6,786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,085
of 370,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#36
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.