You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Safety and Efficacy of Human Muse Cell-Based Product for Acute Myocardial Infarction in a First-in-Human Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-20-0307 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Toshiyuki Noda, Kazuhiko Nishigaki, Shinya Minatoguchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 6 | 19% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 28 | 88% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 25 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 25 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,730,705
of 25,744,802 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#62
of 2,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,907
of 434,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,744,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.