| Title |
Delays in referral from primary care worsen survival for patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x710441 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chanpreet S Arhi, Elaine M Burns, Alex Bottle, George Bouras, Paul Aylin, Paul Ziprin, Ara Darzi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 40% |
| Oman | 1 | 20% |
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| Australia | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 49% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#2,995,888
of 23,215,490 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,351
of 4,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,168
of 398,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#35
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,215,490 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 398,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.