↓ Skip to main content

Sustained generation of electricity by the spore-forming, Gram-positive, Desulfitobacterium hafniense strain DCB2

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Sustained generation of electricity by the spore-forming, Gram-positive, Desulfitobacterium hafniense strain DCB2
Published in
Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, October 2006
DOI 10.1007/s00253-006-0564-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. E. Milliken, H. D. May

Abstract

Desulfitobacterium hafniense strain DCB2 generates electricity in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) when humic acids or the humate analog anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS) is added as an electron-carrying mediator. When utilizing formate as fuel, the Gram-positive, spore-forming bacterium generated up to 400 mW/m2 of cathode surface area in a single-chamber MFC with a platinum-containing air-fed cathode. Hydrogen, lactate, pyruvate, and ethanol supported electricity generation, but acetate, propionate, and butyrate did not. Scanning electron microscopy indicated that strain DCB2 colonized the surface of a current-generating anode but not of an unconnected electrode. The electricity was recovered fully within minutes after the exchange of the medium in the anode chamber and within a week after an exposure of a colonized anode to 90 degrees C for 20 min. Of the six strains of Desulfitobacteria tested, all of which would reduce AQDS, only D. hafniense strain DCB2 continued to reduce AQDS and generate electricity for more than 24 h, indicating that reduction of the humate analog alone is insufficient to sustain electrode reduction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Belgium 2 2%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Thailand 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Unknown 91 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 26%
Researcher 17 17%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 34%
Engineering 13 13%
Environmental Science 11 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 9%
Chemistry 8 8%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 19 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2012.
All research outputs
#17,286,379
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#6,032
of 8,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,755
of 86,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
#48
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.