↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive and subjective dose-response effects of acute oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in infrequent cannabis users

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, July 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
297 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
330 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive and subjective dose-response effects of acute oral Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in infrequent cannabis users
Published in
Psychopharmacology, July 2002
DOI 10.1007/s00213-002-1169-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Valerie H. Curran, Catherine Brignell, Sally Fletcher, Paul Middleton, John Henry

Abstract

Although some aspects of memory functions are known to be acutely impaired by delta(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta(9)-THC; the main active constituent of marijuana), effects on other aspects of memory are not known and the time course of functional impairments is unclear. The present study aimed to detail the acute and residual cognitive effects of delta(9)-THC in infrequent cannabis users. A balanced, double-blind cross-over design was used to compare the effects of 7.5 mg and 15 mg delta(9)-THC with matched placebo in 15 male volunteers. Participants were assessed pre and 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24 and 48 h post-drug. Delta(9)-THC 15 mg impaired performance on two explicit memory tasks at the time of peak plasma concentration (2 h post-drug). At the same time point, performance on an implicit memory task was preserved intact. The higher dose of delta(9)-THC resulted in no learning whatsoever occurring over a three-trial selective reminding task at 2 h. Working memory was generally unaffected by delta(9)-THC. In several tasks, delta(9)-THC increased both speed and error rates, reflecting "riskier" speed-accuracy trade-offs. Subjective effects were also most marked at 2 h but often persisted longer, with participants rating themselves as "stoned" for 8 h. Participants experienced a strong drug effect, liked this effect and, until 4 h, wanted more oral delta(9)-THC. No effects of delta(9)-THC were found 24 or 48 h following ingestion indicating that the residual effects of oral delta(9)-THC are minimal. These data demonstrate that oral delta(9)-THC impairs episodic memory and learning in a dose-dependent manner whilst sparing perceptual priming and working memory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 330 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 2%
United States 5 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 315 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 57 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 17%
Researcher 43 13%
Student > Master 41 12%
Other 22 7%
Other 54 16%
Unknown 58 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 82 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 49 15%
Neuroscience 45 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 6%
Other 35 11%
Unknown 79 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,363,085
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#329
of 5,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,124
of 47,679 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#4
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,320 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,679 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.