↓ Skip to main content

Syrian hamsters as a small animal model for SARS-CoV-2 infection and countermeasure development

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
79 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
274 X users
patent
8 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
957 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
610 Mendeley
Title
Syrian hamsters as a small animal model for SARS-CoV-2 infection and countermeasure development
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, June 2020
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2009799117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masaki Imai, Kiyoko Iwatsuki-Horimoto, Masato Hatta, Samantha Loeber, Peter J. Halfmann, Noriko Nakajima, Tokiko Watanabe, Michiko Ujie, Kenta Takahashi, Mutsumi Ito, Shinya Yamada, Shufang Fan, Shiho Chiba, Makoto Kuroda, Lizheng Guan, Kosuke Takada, Tammy Armbrust, Aaron Balogh, Yuri Furusawa, Moe Okuda, Hiroshi Ueki, Atsuhiro Yasuhara, Yuko Sakai-Tagawa, Tiago J. S. Lopes, Maki Kiso, Seiya Yamayoshi, Noriko Kinoshita, Norio Ohmagari, Shin-ichiro Hattori, Makoto Takeda, Hiroaki Mitsuya, Florian Krammer, Tadaki Suzuki, Yoshihiro Kawaoka

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 274 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 610 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 610 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 108 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 88 14%
Student > Master 45 7%
Student > Bachelor 45 7%
Other 40 7%
Other 93 15%
Unknown 191 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 77 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 67 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 28 5%
Other 112 18%
Unknown 218 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 833. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2024.
All research outputs
#22,461
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#686
of 103,685 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,051
of 435,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#27
of 1,097 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103,685 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,097 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.