| Title |
Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation After Catheter Ablation or Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in the CABANA Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.04.065 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeanne E. Poole, Tristram D. Bahnson, Kristi H. Monahan, George Johnson, Hoss Rostami, Adam P. Silverstein, Hussein R. Al-Khalidi, Yves Rosenberg, Daniel B. Mark, Kerry L. Lee, Douglas L. Packer, CABANA Investigators and ECG Rhythm Core Lab, Jeanne E. Poole, Nazem Akoum, Pierre Aoukar, Ulrika Birgersdotter-Green, Joseph Blatt, Yong Mei Cha, Mina Chung, Marye Gleva, Taya Glotzer, Charles Henrickson, Jack Kron, Vikas Kuriachan, Siva Mulpuru, Peter Noseworthy, Kris Patton, Jordan Prutkin, Ravi Ranjan, Robert Rho, Andrea Russo, Eric Stecker, Wendy Tzou, Laura Vitali Serdoz, Mauri Wilson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 10 | 17% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 5 | 8% |
| Argentina | 4 | 7% |
| Japan | 3 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Mexico | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 41 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Scientists | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 154 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 27 | 18% |
| Unknown | 67 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 33% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 73 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2022.
All research outputs
#807,126
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#2,019
of 16,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,804
of 433,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#51
of 240 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,758 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 240 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.