↓ Skip to main content

Causes of temporal variability of lead in domestic plumbing systems

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, July 1990
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
Title
Causes of temporal variability of lead in domestic plumbing systems
Published in
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, July 1990
DOI 10.1007/bf00454749
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael R. Schock

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 38 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 23%
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Researcher 5 13%
Other 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 12 31%
Engineering 10 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Chemistry 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,728,669
of 25,085,910 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#177
of 3,004 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#865
of 14,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,085,910 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,004 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 14,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them