↓ Skip to main content

Predicting White Matter Integrity from Multiple Common Genetic Variants

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychopharmacology, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predicting White Matter Integrity from Multiple Common Genetic Variants
Published in
Neuropsychopharmacology, April 2012
DOI 10.1038/npp.2012.49
Pubmed ID
Authors

Omid Kohannim, Neda Jahanshad, Meredith N Braskie, Jason L Stein, Ming-Chang Chiang, April H Reese, Derrek P Hibar, Arthur W Toga, Katie L McMahon, Greig I de Zubicaray, Sarah E Medland, Grant W Montgomery, Nicholas G Martin, Margaret J Wright, Paul M Thompson

Abstract

Several common genetic variants have recently been discovered that appear to influence white matter microstructure, as measured by diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Each genetic variant explains only a small proportion of the variance in brain microstructure, so we set out to explore their combined effect on the white matter integrity of the corpus callosum. We measured six common candidate single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the COMT, NTRK1, BDNF, ErbB4, CLU, and HFE genes, and investigated their individual and aggregate effects on white matter structure in 395 healthy adult twins and siblings (age: 20-30 years). All subjects were scanned with 4-tesla 94-direction high angular resolution diffusion imaging. When combined using mixed-effects linear regression, a joint model based on five of the candidate SNPs (COMT, NTRK1, ErbB4, CLU, and HFE) explained ≈ 6% of the variance in the average fractional anisotropy (FA) of the corpus callosum. This predictive model had detectable effects on FA at 82% of the corpus callosum voxels, including the genu, body, and splenium. Predicting the brain's fiber microstructure from genotypes may ultimately help in early risk assessment, and eventually, in personalized treatment for neuropsychiatric disorders in which brain integrity and connectivity are affected.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 82 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 26%
Researcher 17 20%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 19%
Psychology 15 18%
Neuroscience 12 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 18 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2012.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychopharmacology
#4,396
of 5,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,955
of 174,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychopharmacology
#27
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,163 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.