↓ Skip to main content

What science means to me: Understanding personal identification with (evolutionary) science using the sociology of (non)religion

Overview of attention for article published in Public Understanding of Science, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What science means to me: Understanding personal identification with (evolutionary) science using the sociology of (non)religion
Published in
Public Understanding of Science, June 2020
DOI 10.1177/0963662520923110
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen H. Jones, Fern Elsdon-Baker, Rebecca Catto, Tom Kaden

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 3%
Librarian 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 18 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 18%
Psychology 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 20 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,081,019
of 25,661,882 outputs
Outputs from Public Understanding of Science
#243
of 1,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,953
of 434,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Public Understanding of Science
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,661,882 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,118 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.