You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Economic Inequality, Immigrants and Selective Solidarity: From Perceived Lack of Opportunity to In-group Favoritism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of Political Science, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0007123420000046 |
| Authors |
Gabriele Magni |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 10% |
| United States | 7 | 9% |
| Germany | 4 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 5% |
| Italy | 3 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 38 | 49% |
| Members of the public | 36 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 15% |
| Unknown | 30 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 30 | 46% |
| Psychology | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 27 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#825,772
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Political Science
#115
of 1,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,809
of 435,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Political Science
#5
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.